Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Harold Gashe v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 20-3466 · judgment January 19, 2021
Certiorari denied · January 10, 2022
Question presented
- Is it fair and equal justice for defendants who present under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) that the previously harsh 924(c) stacking is an extraordinary and compelling reason deserving of relief be "Denied" in one Appellate Court, when the exact same issue is "Granted" in another Appellate Court?'; District Courts are split on the same question even in the same circuit with defendants of similar backgrounds.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael R. Dreeben
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jan 10 2022Petition DENIED.
- Dec 16 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Dec 02 2021Reply of petitioner Harold Gashe filed.
- Nov 12 2021Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Oct 08 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 12, 2021. See Rule 30.1
- Oct 07 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 12, 2021 to November 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 02 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 12, 2021.
- Sep 01 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 10, 2021 to October 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 11 2021Response Requested. (Due September 10, 2021)
- Jun 24 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 21 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Apr 19 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 14, 2021)