Richard Wesley Bryan v. Jeffrey Uttecht, Warden

has the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (USDC) decision conflict with this aggrieved party's fundamental First Amendment Right?

has the NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS (COA) sanctioned i.e. supported, the USDC's unjustifiable decision?

did either the USDC or the COA "Resolve" any of the plainly pleaded "justiciable" (Article III.) "claim?s" or allegation's?

did the USDC & the COA sanction/support the STATE COURT'S Clerk's & Budge's willful misconduct & willful malice?

has the USDC & COA willfully departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceeding's, i.e., the willful violat­ ion of the Specific/Statutory-[Legislatures.Enacted/Principles]- Provisions for entertaining an-[Original]-Habeas Corpus-Action?

does-[any]-Federal Court "Lack.Jurisdiction" over a "matter" (brought to their attention in good-faith, by Affidavit; and declared under penalty of perjury) that plainly involves the willful depravation of fundamental, inalienable, rights by STATE "Bad-Actor's," specifically, but not limited to this aggrieved party's fundamental First Amendment Right To Redress?

has the USDC & COA violated, "Model Penal Code §2.06? B) would jurists of reason conclude that the USDC or the COA "Resolved" any of this aggrieved party's Art.III., "Claim!s"?

would jurists of reason conclude that this aggrieved party's Constitutional issue's are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further?

doss this aggrieved party have a fundamental right to an "equitable.remedy" in an Art.III., "Court of Equity"?

does the " fundamental -rmiscarriagerrof-* justice -.exception" apply in this aggrieved party 1s-[Original]-state, Habeas Corpus?

does this "supreme.Court." sic, i.e., an Article III., Court of Equity; as opposed to the SUPREME.COURT-QF-THE.UNITED-STATES, SIC, an executive/administrative "COURT" (28 U.S.C. §451); have "equity.jurisdiction" to "Review" this aggrieved party's, State and Federal, "Original" Habeas Corpus-Action's-de- nave?

does this aggrieved party have a fundamental right to "Equal Protection" of the Supreme. "Uaw.of.the.Land? Duestion(s) Page 1 of 1