Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Anthony A. Patel v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.
IFP petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B307843 · judgment October 2, 2020
Questions presented
-
Can the Executive Branch of U.S. Government impose martial law upon all courts in America so that judges follow the law?
-
If federal judges do not follow the law, does the Executive have inherent authority to supersede courts?
-
Do judges have the right to sanction litigants for complying with The Federalist Papers ?
-
What remedies do the President and Vice President have against courts in which judges in America are vexatious to the interests of the American people?
-
What legal power exists under Article 2 of the Constitution to compel all nine justices of this Supreme Court to resign so that the President can appoint more capable judges?
-
Does the President have the inherent right to recall federal judges for not doing their jobs properly under the law? Clr^r-i o+.i+.n f.i r>T-i.al1 nw./frorm sni i lives .wh O are still alive (Presidents Bush, Clinton, Obama and Trump) to demand their appointed judges resign for violating their oaths?
-
What right does a judge in America have to sanction a litigant for following the law and trying to serve his/her nation?
-
Does the Constitution allow children of the next generation to succeed despite the errors of their judicial system?
-
How many petitions from Appellant does this Supreme Court have to deny before President Biden and Vice President Harris have good cause under their inherent Executive Authority to replace every judicial officer in the United States? 2 Petition for Writ Certiorari and Mandate for Executive Authority
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Anthony A. Patel
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 22 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- May 24 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2021)