Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
William Severs v. Andrew J. Bruck, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 20-3153 · judgment March 9, 2021
Questions presented
Mr. William Severs make leave to appeal the following issues:
-
Whether the Decisions of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the District Court for the District of New Jersey were contrary to the United States Supreme Court decisions in Garza v. Idaho, 586 U.S. , 139 S.Ct. 738 (2019); Roe v. Flore-Ortega, 584 U.S. 470
-
and McCoy v. Louisiana, 584 U.S. , 138 S.Ct. 1500 (2018)
-
Whether Petitioner was subjected to Ineffective Assistance of Third Circuit Appointed Counsel when Counsel failed to Raise and argue the Garza Issue on Appeal to the Third Circuit when Petitioner's Appeal was pending at the time when Garza was decided? (see District Court Opinion at Appx C at *6); (see also Appendix D-l to D-7, Severs v. Attorney Gen, of New Jersey, No. 18-1822, 793 F.App'x 72 (3d Cir. Nov. 5, 2019)) &
Counsel of record
For petitioner
William Severs
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 4, 2021 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 15 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- May 19 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 2, 2021)