Mike Vigil v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

•m* <rT'’.TT-^7T jk JL J . •* ' " •;K ‘ »A! V t * .k rv V 79 a v:v. ... . v ;, i N. Is this Document that I Served Proudly In the Military Armed Forces to PROTECT 6 Years TRUSTWORTHY ?? United States v.Hiot^6WFM%5T7m(?lhCb. 1982) (stating standard). 4 f i •^ Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion for summary affirmance (Docket Entry No. 9) and summanlQffirm the district court! s judgment .FUed Sept . i i , 2020 choosen from a list of The Case Cited above ( 9th Cir. ) was in their Opening Brief filed Cases Cited by the U.S. Attorneys Entry No. 9 to Affirm the District Court's Judgment. See EntryJ^ United States vs.Hooton the Government is the Plaintiff, CLEARLY the Defendant is the Petitioner Disabled Veteran Mike Vigil.viewed FAIR HEARING Granted In the Above Case Received by 7th Amend. a to Hooton to call Witnesses,Present Evidence, to Cross examine and to have findings supported by evidence. In the Federal district Court disabled Veteran Petitioner Mike Vigil filed 8/21/19 Before the Clerk Motion OPEN COURT HEARING 7th Amend Local Rule 78-1 Evid.Clerk timely Date Stamped,this Issue Raised with 9th Cir^in petitioner's Brief and Motion For Recosideration Appendix-----D---- Federal District Judge OMITTED Motion for Open Court Hearing filed timely NO entry in Docket was never Scheduled on Court's Future Calendar. Further No Ruling on OPEN COURT HEARING,. ( ZERO ENTRY ) J January 6,2021 Thousands of Federal Court Judge Mentally ILL. People Rushed the U.S. Congress Domistic Terroists were Told and Arrested they will have their Hearing or,trial in Open Court. Thousand upon thousands cross the United States Border < illegally Await Open Court Hearings. Petioner Mike Vigil is a Natural Born Citizen Over Seas Saved the Lives of 6 fellow Soldiers 1969-70-71 Outstanding Military Service Certficate Armed Forces Appendix C <"> QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 2 Of 4 My Question is the Below STATUTE Valid and Firm ?? _Trhe federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act has waived its immunity in certain cases “in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances. ” 28U.S. C.A. U 1346(b), 2674. ~ The U.S. Attorneys Answer and Motion to Dismiss filed 08/05/ 19 Omitted { ET/AL 9 • Unrepresented 14 Agents, Defendants,Employees .) Must the U.S.Attorneys file a Motion for Immunity to Proceed with Defective Pleadings. Pursuant FRCP 15 to Cure the U.S. Attorneys Must file for leave to Amend FRCP 15 No Evid. on Docket Entrys Visit Appendix . Local Rule Civ. Procedure(1 5) TO CURE the Pleading is 14 Days time Deadline has clearly EXPIRED. NO entrys U.S. Attorneys filed Motion to Strick FRCP 12 (f) Agents,Defendants,Employees ( ET,A1,. ) Nor NO Entry Federal District Judge on it's own Motion Open Court Hearing to Strick Pursuant to FRCP 12(f) Agents defendants Employees 14 from The Plaintiff's Original filed 06/04/19. ACT OF CONGRESS Rviflpnnp Rule 1002 Judcres are PROHIBITED THE INTRODUCTION into Evidence secondary UNLESS it is shown the ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HAS BEEN LOST OR DESTROYED, Neither has been Proven by the Lower Courts. ALL ORDERS AND PLEADINGS FROM THE LOWER COURTS DEFECTIVE. Best evidence rule. The "‘best evidence rule” prohibits VISIT ' the introduction into evidence of secondary evidence APPENDIX. unless it is shown that original document has been A lost or destroyed or is beyond jurisdiction of court Lower CTS. without fault of the offering party; if original docu- Entrys ment is lost, then secondary evidence is properly admissible. State v. Stephens, Mo.App., 556 S.W.2d APPENDIX 722, 723. Fed.R.Evid. 1002 states the basic rule as B follows: “To prove the content of a writing, record- ________ ing, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or Appendix C photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by Act of Congress.” As to what constitutes an “original writing”, see Original.