Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Tamara Rouhi v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 20-1979 · judgment December 21, 2020
Questions presented
-
There has been no redress of my grievance.
-
The Defendants did not make a single valid point, but still prevailed in the case. That is unjust.
-
My rights were violated by Federal District Court of Maryland and the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
-
Iād like the previously mentioned injustices to be corrected. Z II. PARTIES Plaintiff/Appellant Tamara Rouhi 125 Fennmgton Circle Owings Mills MD 21117 Defendants/Appellees The Defendant Represented by Comcast Attorney Management Adam S Caldwell Comcast Center Davis Write Tremaine LLP 1701 John F Kennedy Blvd 1919 Pennsylvania Ave. NWjSte 800 Philadelphia, PA 19103-2838 ' Washington, DC 20006 .
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Tamara Rouhi
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- May 12 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 25, 2021)