In Re Silas Wilson, Jr.

/. Whether this C oust h as jurisdiction to issue a Writof /noun dam vs, directed to ike court of appeals, on the basisthat it has abused its discretion in declining to reMieuo de noto, a judgment ■f ram tb& district court's denial of, your pro S-e Peti tioner'S, Rule io(b)ifj motion to set aside its judgment2. Whether a m is reading of a motion, th+f result in the use of Untrue f&cts e in tv t%fc\rte Rule 6o(b)Ct) motion h tar meg . fc m^ke a determination to Set aside c\ judgment, Consh tuft cun fr\ adequate and Uft/n eamngfuf hearing - li ytS (oil Is an ina d ego ate and unmeaning ful hearing the Same af mo hearing <xf<alL J.f y€J (bj IP CK proceeding' Conducted m the aho^/e noted manner, IS that f ro ceedmcj Conducted m a Manner inconsistent j/0 i th due process "of I a a)* 3'VJkzther court of appeal otbuj’ed its discretion by declining to Ke\iitiO/ fro St Petitioner's, due pro Cess of Ia,<J claim, ari sing after opening appeal brief ioaS -filed, a*od arose during district Court's e&parte hearing of a f\ule 00 lb)(t) motion to Set aside judgment.