Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Andi Mustafa v. Michigan

IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Michigan, No. 351857 · judgment January 17, 2020


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021

Question presented

I, Is Plaintiff entitled to withdraw his no contest plea when he was not interrogated by the judge to determine the factual basis for his plea and the Judge did not state her reasons for concluding that the proper administration of justice did not require Mr, Mustafa to be Interrogated regarding his participation in a crime? II. Is Mr. Mustafa entitled to withdraw his plea where the initial search of his residence was illegal and subsequent searches were done without a valid warrant or the search warrants that were overbroad? Ill, Is Mr, Mustafa entitled to withdraw his plea and request a new trial or evidentiary hearing after Mr. Mustafa entered an involuntary plea because retained counsel rendered ineffective assistance when he failed to ensure the plea record contained sufficient information to establish a factual basis for each charged offense to which Plaintiff pled no contest?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Andi Mustafa

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 08 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Sep 28 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2021)