Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Andi Mustafa v. Michigan
IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Michigan, No. 351857 · judgment January 17, 2020
Question presented
I, Is Plaintiff entitled to withdraw his no contest plea when he was not interrogated by the judge to determine the factual basis for his plea and the Judge did not state her reasons for concluding that the proper administration of justice did not require Mr, Mustafa to be Interrogated regarding his participation in a crime? II. Is Mr. Mustafa entitled to withdraw his plea where the initial search of his residence was illegal and subsequent searches were done without a valid warrant or the search warrants that were overbroad? Ill, Is Mr, Mustafa entitled to withdraw his plea and request a new trial or evidentiary hearing after Mr. Mustafa entered an involuntary plea because retained counsel rendered ineffective assistance when he failed to ensure the plea record contained sufficient information to establish a factual basis for each charged offense to which Plaintiff pled no contest?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Andi Mustafa
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Sep 28 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2021)