Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jimmy Christopher Jackson v. North Carolina

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 19-7679 · judgment February 21, 2020


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021

Question presented

^ ^etf f CW'f'A', .^1 VS yyp.;k VWf W.e AWAr, ^ We fWdAes/\vusVe^ aAumisWA' \ esVoAe- Wud$ \rusV Vwe <x boW WoWe. VWV ra WoW ea eg;'AW- w^jWsajs WeWWecb efc cdlaWob-? X !&£ :p ;V • ^ We WJ&A u^W uiV)6 ace W <0? aW VW mfefekueil, ^to^e<Vy AWteft ■_es\aW W WWW Vb l?«W>«£ £WW 0£6eSS(V^ 6o3> ^ cW £W, W esWW AW vWceed W Wdaee AWvV cxudV WAV WuJW eaV<4 WcWeW0^ 00ODOJAIU' sue A acxe^W^Ao e&VWYW We c^tmW W vreA Vtae (£W) Wb<W CX O-vR W&ea\ ^OOO-CCAS C>'M& VoWs j, 3,^?ocf cf rU<frW ■Tied WddWW uWn WevW; uJ)cxxco,nVs; ^ aW V?oeAs, C^oWWW cute ^e vW^eged (Aosjces) o^cunsV WW^ esWw,i\ W^vV Vo WWtW| fW ' SeVc§? Aajx cW.-^ -Q>ems l^QOXbx \b%; ^(Mti-V. We- wWcWWWl oceAW AWAYf \x)xaed Vne edW eW W^eVveva^ •soa eWxfe- ^c>M We cM^ecaWAS WvW We Vox WLW eeWcos va We Wv'MW denuc via f(Xou^4ed ? KW>, i£> ntd A AW WWocry , W WWrs A? ■docVito^n esYWe owd'Wf Vb WW^ W (^VdnlWes (beadWs') V'^ vaWmV^od texfcmt stnA W We \l^//xto cmW f We WW dadWn WW WU VW&CvUl Wf AAuaa.C'idWs, W|' We. Wodh^ W edlVWWs Ov«tA 1 'WdWeecs ? . , ^ 4 AooP cf cWA, VlW vV \s ad WeAfiM^i^W1 We Yawpedv\a V.O-LA. d USC A l 54L eec^uesW VW US. kVVocAej UeeeW Vo Weed We Vrus-V^es/ , OsWAo^ oqevW Wr We SAW W ViC- Ao W W^/seotfWe.s M cffdeA^W Wd65c>A esHaW, Wceveey.WvU W,, x/\c\ \abeos estate, 6.W A We cxce A<Wc^/aWAoe3 w ao\ Vain ever VW e-eeavdVy \WfuwxeW W <e%Wdao o3ea\d WcS be GanSiW'W Wx^ar^ . frauAaie.A cen<-ex\w\eaV, ads cf’ aWcWnaW veWVWVc^A^, W We. ces^oWMs 4faW^> ^vd ordAefa We -^fWs -W VW "cbocoWa §We dr U. C -, reVtoae -Wevr qaas\ \nVered/das'A-ve Waana/ ^ Ws VW WeA >osseSS vWyM^WA dfW cf' VnusV/ AeW cf cxss^n^W m WcV)d£>n esVde » t^ae&Wn^S CbW^uit, cn - We aAA-eA bViceV i c£z- -u;.T3T'l. L, 5. '>cqc£ £ cioxwc, 4t£cV \V g vN^cAeLWu aC6 1 suus sWVuAa'fy ^l\s. Vio^'^VruMeiMs \®6U^b Vrov«^cVi6'05 ckWws de^osiWA aIc\ vwacvwe W 'Vta oor^fa\GA bteVe ef? VL£>. G&vMMexacxS bfcMeXa/ aaprfe aYccxbeA. ^qc\Ssoo esMr« GUH? SID: HLOM'^Lh tD OMMeracxl \jo$ar <Wt£eA as\u»^aia\ ocn^M"^ bfivness W>? G?<£ <P rUv^.U'^-A-V buwile cf xaWre-sH vcv/us<^r> ^acXi^l aXlcAtA "Vv^ CkA Gao gsgl <V ooWn. AGsbeA, \WAy Go u&G) Can c&\Ws VfeSfcosW' wvft Vo excWie' Don I'^uGke, SeA, c»r cyve.c^y cP ■ ^ ^ «■ “'°w ^ ettWsp'w bv \C£P&'f\ oiwciaw x\S, SE2K5$£852k -»**»“ baMo^C- Got'fe£-\ 4 loPl P T K\ l—-4-. \ Vi ! Q

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jimmy Christopher Jackson

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 08 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. May 15 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 23, 2021)