Jack E. Allen v. Pennsylvania

I) DOES THE PETITIONER DESERVE ANOTHER TRIAL BASED UPON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS? ANSWER: YES

1. DOES THE PETITIONER CLAIM HIS TOTAL INNOCENCE BASED UPON DNA EVIDENCE FOR EXONERATION PURPOSES? ANSWER: YES

2. DID PETITIONER REQUEST LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION INTO FEDERAL CRIMES BEING COMMITTED? ANSWER: YES

3. WAS BLOOD SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THE CRIME SCENE FOR DNA IDENTIFICATION OR OTHER INVESTIGATORY METHODS? ANSWER: NO

4. DOES THE PETITIONER/DEFENDANT HAVE SUCH RIGHT TO SUCH DNA SAMPLES FOR EXONERATION PURPOSES IN CLAIMS OF HIS INNOCENCE? ANSWER: YES

5. ARE THERE FORGED AND FALSIFIED RECORDS AND/OR INFORMATION BEFORE THE COURTS TO FALSIFY A CONVICTION WRONGFULLY? ANSWER: YES

6. DOES THE PETITIONER THINK IN THE FOREFRONT THAT SECTION 3521 OF TITLE 18 U.S.C.§ IS BEING USED TO COMMIT CRIMES AGAINST THE PETITIONER? ANSWER: YES . 8) WAS THERE A VIOLATION OF THE MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AG AND THE PERSON BEING PROTECTED? ANSWER: YES

7. SHOULD THERE BE AN EXHUMATION OF THE ALLEGED DEAD CORPSE OF. PETITIONER'S WIFE,WHOM HE CLAIMS IS STILL ALIVE AND WELL? ANSWER: TOTALLY YES U) xF 7■

8. DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE THE RIGHT TO PRESENT PROOF BY DEFENSE WITNESSES AND LEGAL DOCUMENTATION? ANSWER: YES

9. DID THE TRIAL COURT COMMENCE SUCH PLAIN ERROR IN SUCH CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS NOT ALLOWING THE PETITIONER NOT GETTING A "FAIR AND IMPARTIAL" TRIAL UNDER THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS? ANSWER: TOTALLY YES

10. WAS THERE A "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"INVOLVED" ANSWER: YES

11. WAS THERE SUCH "CAUSE AND PREJUDICE"TOTALLY INVOLVED? ANSWER: YES

12. DID PETITIONER SEE HIS ALLEGED DEAD WIFE UPFRONT AT SCIHOUTZDALE/AND FACE TO FACE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS? ANSWER: YES

13. DOES THE PETITIONER DESERVE SUCH GRANTING OF A GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION INTO SUCH CRIMES AGAINST HIMV? ANSWER: YES

14. IS THE PETITIONER FALSELY IMPRISONED UNDER FALSIFIED RECORDS AND INFORMATION - AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS? ANSWER: YES

15. ARE STATE AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS INVOLVED IN THIS CASE, AT HAND? ANSWER: YES

16. DOES THE PETITIONER DESERVE A REMEDY FROM THIS HONORABLE COURT FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS? ANSWER: YES ,r v e*

17. DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL OR AN ATTORNEY? ANSWER: YES

18. DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHOSE HIS OWN COUNSEL OR AN ATTORNEY OF CHOICE? ANSWER: YES

19. DID SUCH ATTORNEY OR COUNSEL APPOINTED BY- THE COURT ABANDONED THE PETITIONER? ANSWER: YES

20. IS THERE MUCH REASONABLE DOUBT IN PETITIONERS CASE? ANSWER: YES

21. WAS THERE ALOT REASONABLE DOUBT FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE END OF PETITIONERS CASE,AT HAND? ANSWER: YES

22. WAS EVIDENCE EXEMPTED FROM THE CRIME SCENE? ANSWER: YES

23. WAS ANY EVIDENCE COLLECTED FROM THE CRIME SCENE? ANSWER: NO.