Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Kevin L. Martin v. Kenneth P. Cotter, et al.

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 21-1313 · judgment April 29, 2021

Dismissed · October 4, 2021

Questions presented

. uf / Artf' Jr: lCc\f(r> &F £yuqf' fc4rcAi <2-7 0 f L e7 uJ> on ( jf)/n AU-/t(5 dl 7 c-n by A-c f^S z 4 j/z-4'i'f' /?->£ 4l*-? 4^ srtatcc./ in ft*/'-e'c^

  1. u//i< f ^ '/'/•£* / aLuJ-c oF frlSc-Ar.-he ^/- a/1 /I/ -7 ■4o ^C't’lstn ("L<, Ju^tsJu b~> Eyi*« f L Jr ^sci iAL. /»7 A C-7 /i aJ f *

  2. LA) I" c jjn r *t J-La uisJ-jctc^ Ce tsf -C. / «LhJX. e>f(2\Sc^<xAl1 ky -/•<■ p> W c/ A JtH4 1C. c. A jejune- y€-r // r r /> 0 4i^ Lv Ct \ Srcfctf^ {kg. 4~f sk /< rj u ( k~ ~h cMer! Ir+cjr ¥ k) (_S C- e s~> 1/ i C ~f~? <''7 -

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Kevin L. Martin

For respondent
Aaron Thomas Craft
Office of the Indiana Attorney General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
  2. Jun 24 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Jun 21 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent Kenneth Cotter, et al. to respond filed.
    Main Document
  4. Apr 29 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2021)
    Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service