Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Rickey Benson v. Tennessee, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 20-6005 · judgment January 11, 2021
Questions presented
S fave fate US DC q/)d ysCAIfi neglected the serious physic*/ injury of /^> S&. /'/)<? forced to Co/jtwie, prescribed dtugs .with out My CMSenff fidnupped <?nd injec ted by n needfa with 4 drug tbit Mtde Mte unubfa fa think nd writ W caused Me, ertrme hjgP bfood pressure, ?nd does tffa co/)<sdifr/fe<s Ser/ous fn^sm^fd/Jury ? --------------------------------- ------------— ■ ■— ....... ;------- yr Does being farced do co/is uM& pfescr/bed dkug<s wifhouf My Con sen / jV - £>fify tf£ being kidnapped <Md tinjeefed by 4 fleejfa With t dh/j.
-
Does being Ser/bys physicqffy injured goes beyond being in /MMfOenf dwger ofser/ous physred injury? — t. Did Z know faint tfadvie/judge Would issue 40 order- for Me fa be fruOs/erred fa 4 Menfaf hospifor w/thout My consent fa order io fife My co/uyfain f before Zf wes <Stf/busjjhysfcu/ly injured, end ws s 4freedy serious fbysiCn/Jy injured before jt w$s u&ie fa Pi/e My Ccnpfafaf ? $* Did fae sfafa /judge Send Me -fa the Men fa f hospital u/ffheeut My Consrnt fadieVr Me Metfaffy disubfe fa iffresent Mysejytnd fa d^oid t Jury~far/4/ q/ld /TOpit Money for die sfaie by violating My Cidif rig fisj 4jJ whaf re^Sen dif ift stoic,/judge hntfc fa Send Me ~fa die Mcnfaf hospifd where, ZT mjos forced ~fa cWuMe prescribed drugs w/fhouf My Coe)sen-fa?
-
Does USCfC & Zq-MZ btS SOM)tthfa)q fa do wdh USC/pl? -# 2° -<Zbhf jfen docu/umfs: S’, io if /2, i3 <Md /7 op U6CM, erZo - 5Uk 4/e refafed fao fate, cm'/ fights t/bfatfon s of USCrfa, tt Zo- U6Z f 7 Zs MM& than fan yefns font enough for Me fa be reffared Prom fate threesfrfkes pn>ujsft>n pursumf fa ZS U5.C Section H/5~(g) when Z faue justified faet tfai& being abused by the USOC / DSC/do Z Z.Xsfae, Mended order Pi/ed1: 0/-)fa£/ 4 ConspfMcy 4nd refafcf/bn 94f Ufahfaion of i due pfoC.eSs ckvse fw under fa)e /&-f- 4nd i/d\ ftMendnenfas. of fije dS, Consfifafieo because, fae 4ScrH> did flef ndd/ess My perh ftcn Per en bene hetrfnp 9nd Mof/on fa enjoin cross c /dm fa pedffa/bn for en bone heeri/u which is uifccbed fa My Mofaon for feconsid&ddkn of usrc -# zo- oZ/s/? % U/4S Z rjhf or WoM fa Sfarf end Continue fa C£>nsuM/P)g the divg(s>S> by Mouth becnUSe it u?4s Ve/y pnkfuf being forced 4nd infected infa My &ettoct<s end thought- if would benefit/ My cise 4nd iCk^se, fn>M J0igrdonf 4nJ when if did r&fX&fap con sumfag if Qnd/diSCoUe/^-rhqp My CiOi/ fiffra m/€/& V/o/qfed Z ___________ y fye2-.oft3--------- -----
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Rickey Benson
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 01 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- May 14 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 16, 2021)