Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Leonard Patti

Paid petition

Certiorari denied · February 22, 2021

Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.

Questions presented

Why was I denied my right to a trial by jury, or even a hearing on the case? The only thing that had any bearing on this case was the Affidavit of Merit: So, why wasn’t the doctrine of Common knowledge considered?
Why is the Affidavit of Merit, an unholy, prejudice law, for a special interest group, considered a law? Is this racism?
Did not the affidavit of merit give Dr. Peck Jr. the license to assault me?
Why is the law, i.e. the Affidavit of Merit, put before the facts in my case? Is not the purpose of the law to judge the facts?
Why wasn’t I told the implant could not be removed, even before the fourth operation? Obviously, that is a he. So, if the implant could not be removed, why did Dr. Peck Jr. operate?
According to: The Doctrine of Informed Consent and Refusal, I have been assaulted four times: Isn’t the Doctrine of Informed Consent and Refusal also a law? So why was assault not a cause of action, in The N.J. Superior Court?
Was not George Peck Jr. covering his tracks, for the statute of limitations when he did the subsequent operations? i.e. the three subsequent assaults?
What, am I a practice cadaver?

For petitioner
Leonard Patti

For respondent
Donald A. Klein
Weiner Law Group, LLP

Subject area
Private Action (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Feb 22 2021
Petition DENIED.
Jan 13 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
Jan 05 2021
Waiver of right of respondent George C. Peck to respond filed.
Oct 01 2020
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due January 11, 2021)