Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Leonard Patti

Paid petition

Certiorari denied · February 22, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. Why was I denied my right to a trial by jury, or even a hearing on the case? The only thing that had any bearing on this case was the Affidavit of Merit: So, why wasn’t the doctrine of Common knowledge considered?

  2. Why is the Affidavit of Merit, an unholy, prejudice law, for a special interest group, considered a law? Is this racism?

  3. Did not the affidavit of merit give Dr. Peck Jr. the license to assault me?

  4. Why is the law, i.e. the Affidavit of Merit, put before the facts in my case? Is not the purpose of the law to judge the facts?

  5. Why wasn’t I told the implant could not be removed, even before the fourth operation? Obviously, that is a he. So, if the implant could not be removed, why did Dr. Peck Jr. operate?

  6. According to: The Doctrine of Informed Consent and Refusal, I have been assaulted four times: Isn’t the Doctrine of Informed Consent and Refusal also a law? So why was assault not a cause of action, in The N.J. Superior Court?

  7. Was not George Peck Jr. covering his tracks, for the statute of limitations when he did the subsequent operations? i.e. the three subsequent assaults?

  8. What, am I a practice cadaver?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Leonard Patti

For respondent
Donald A. Klein
Weiner Law Group, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Feb 22 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 13 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
  3. Jan 05 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent George C. Peck to respond filed.
  4. Oct 01 2020
    Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due January 11, 2021)