Cherie Phillips v. Charo Rowley

Whether the Idaho Courts denied the fairness and justice of Due Process when my pro se pleadings were not reviewed and were summarily dismissed while the judges acted as attorneys in the Respondent's defense and with legal strategy.

Whether the State of Idaho demanding Hospice as "mandatory" under threat of charging me with a "Felony" and enforced by violent martial law and kidnapping "healthy" family members from home, while the Federal Statutes clearly state that Hospice is "Optional" and may be withdrawn at any time, violates the US Constitution.

Whether Respondent Charo Rowley's Court Visitor Report/Supplemental Order, which supported the State of Idaho in completing the Death Penalty of my Mother, being unconstitutional and illegal under Federal, State, and County laws, precludes Ms. Rowley's payment for services rendered.

Whether Respondent Charo Rowley's Court Visitor Report, being a Supplemental Court Order, in full force and effect, which denied my Guardianship rights that had been granted by the Court, and, instead, granted St. Luke's Hospital (SLH) a Shadow Guardianship overpowering all my Guardianship rights, being unconstitutional and illegal under Federal, State and County laws and statutes, precludes its enforcement for payment of Court Visitor services to Ms. Charo Rowley.

Whether Respondent Charo Rowley's breach of statutory duties in violation and noncompliance with governing statutory authority, being unconstitutional and illegal under Federal, State and County laws and statutes, preclude its enforcement for payment for services that she did not legally render.