Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Daryl DeWayne Riggins v. DeAnn Morris, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 20-14598 · judgment December 30, 2020
Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021
Question presented
Hi F\UC.OR2)mUE Ui\TV\ F&TiERRV-T^uV-EQF E\VIL?RDD£TiV\RE. B<2>\ RpRRT'f S RESpDOSlVE PVEFOivnc, musrpv^mvT dr:Der^ the stfctenorms') m tre either PRRt’s Plepouog . * 4 Pur EXRVUPLE , IF? "RIGGinS GOFNpLRKVT RVVtGEtS'j , fc ROIPN GFTHfpRRTtEs' CQnTRfiE.T ,»s RTRcH&n HeReturs £xHV:bvt b ” THE T5ESPDn:kmT<£> fkvsvuer mus-T either r^urt DR 3>EO\ TR\S RVERVUEUT UR PVUR^TVkRT 3URTVS0n STRTE Pft\ SDTl ( m£2»\C.RV. / OFFICERS "> DFF^W-S Bs He./Sue vs uutHOut Kumu V-ETiBE qr vnFoRfMTnnncsi suFRdeot Tn pETlTlonER pQRvn F) 'SEWER RSTO UiWETttER EXHVBVT A IE \«V FRCT B CnPN DF THE pRRT\ES' UUUTRRUT '> 1?ESpuR^ETlT^S) pRA^ RQT Pi.EBTi E-G- ^ RE.SPDTYSsE.OTCS'V RTU'WTCS.'V T\BT E"X\FB\T F\ VS RTTRC-Ht^ TU PE'T(TIDn£R ?)S3VBR>lV.TiEUV?.v|RE.'RX'BGVDS FiHc \3V ROCS’) XBUSHR / UrlrlF\X'B t:Dm PLR\rfT(S')R OR u IVVEZD^Kunxe^YtEV PRuvu Firsts .surrfrr rs rvbg\cg / GRstroert£Rov.ob'st / Poison uqrtroc STATE PRV^TV DVTRRSDnD'BRRRR't (TEST) SpEBRCS) FDR YTSREF ^ £OC\ t^RS^E, UOlORTE RVGGVR-S GBSEMBDUU PURRS'* :usd\RV5 ^ C.WRSAAA3>A\iVS TiRRGG j TWYTZV RRY.VjIDdR FinT) BUTDVDEG. EFW.TiU!£--)U\ SUBEV-TBE^SREGRRTiETv 31 RURORRCbVE. CUORT ms THE RNE.RTVERTtS') TO VUYRdVi THE.V FVRE3SVREETE3V SRRU_TET^EEVTiET) RlvmYTt’E.'T) \T\ RDCDR^.ftRCt DOTH RUCE BC20 , SvmvVRRV.X , R PRKT WIRT ROTj VO \A\S / HER RESpEWSWt PV.EH3UU6 ^TVERT R STfVTESr>ERT(S’> VH RVS/RER PPPDREfiVS ?VER:mG OR TRE GROUPS TRRT THE RMERVOERT RRVSELS') RVWBTERCS') PE RfVTRER THRT FRET (si. C)/EJECTIONS f<>RW>Tts£HecammenRations m CWIL EBSECS^ ,03TECTVDnS 1C R mAOASTRRTE 3vySsGE'>S ( RBR,l^R\AR<.Epps^ DF UUVt&U STRTES 5nHG\STRRTE3D^BE OF SU'CTTHERDTCSTHN^T DrBE-OROVR DRTD UDVTETi STRT&S 3i\STRVGT 3UOUE RsUaWZbuTlLES R/SbUVERj-SR- UR WW SPEEVREUiRSTER1^ REPORT Rf\3i RECD&nTiRTlonCRnT RU^PDRSE TD TVlUSE PB3£C.TVDB(5>SV\RLU 3E U^VTET> \D VEUBTVSTQ TUiURT'i' FW£ (Z-S^ pRGeCS) ■R^I S£DT PRidRj to PERSTtiSSVPft^ PRDffi RDnViRPi'SVE CUDRT- ’ / MOTIONS for Summary JU(lme11^ (FR 'RstnRTi Reference (sV S^'U'SVi UbV\En RVGGvns pVLVDG B3RVEF m SviPPORT OF GR \D npPQSVTVDn ~tEV Pi TTMTtVDriFOR ^UvnmfVRV =V03vGm EOT CS^ , THE PRRtM UiVTR UDUOSEE SHRV-V. RV-SD fW-E^ Rs R SEPRRRTE T>DDHET F.RTRT, RH ELEUTRODm UUP'V Of THE EOOVPLETE TRRFSCRVRT (S) DP ERtR 3)EpD3VTlDO RtFERntie.T\ m 'R»BSWS IBRVEf^ RRSpDDTiEDT(S) pRDSe (.RVEEIOS^ mRH FUE R PRFER Copy DF THE Uc.it>P^ETE / ^e^vc.E_/ GWEVHncE) TVEpasv-tvan REFEREnatSMUTRE'^RVEF. HOUaRR^LE CDURT PREFERS (2UT3&ESmT REQuvRE'i COOTiEnSEi COPIES oF-:DEPD£manTRRSt;RVPT<S') O.E.GnEPHVSICREPREE CDUTmomB POOR prbes DF TRHriSCR\T,E3> TESTimcnN ) . vn-rub1©^^!'^5 EVIHiEncECS^ sHOHV-lVBEtonTR{>ET| in ERtRPART'S SBlEf ,00302,7 ^He fw* ^ V.WEF“ »°“«B ^ REfERBMLt, ft c»-mT«.n wcmcrtkvb t$ut£Tvon(s'> ‘FRESEnTEii \ oF C3VSTFrrEmeu^cs}ciFTnfVTERm>L frets c^spute^ aft ruths purElO UlRfcRR PWTY FtLtiS'i R REsPaasECSb tD RS'TfVTEVUEnYtSY UF TRfVTEfURl. FRCT£S>\ Pis, TRSfUTE/JQ DR urv^vspVitEO), \T StyFH^ IREIlVQ&THE aPPQS'PS PRRT'/VS STRTE3) FRCTCS> ftTYH PfV\RT VTS R£SPRn5E.S tVAERETD mmE3iVRTEtS PDVVDVDVRG EfttH SEPRRRYEEY RViflYBERE-fc FRET (S'), SUPREME COURT RULE ZB. QRREftftBUmtUT RE - DSERU RD. ZQ - ERSE RD, E V 37LQ -Q.S’i OiYKJr SHE Werl no, xd-\hsrb.-e 3RRSE> ?ET\T\DV1ER VE* Z3iE.RT\vmORR\S'J YRVTZA HRu_‘> FRd Lo«\F\tri\» FriwBiRDuAVv RwTi Sus'rdK. dvwefu etri.) 'BESpntvbEnTCs’i xm Petitmn Fdr rvurit up eertiorrrytp PAPERY. Fpom TRt EEVTE35 ST RYES HASTP,\CiT EDURT ^HE SnuTHERn 3i\STRICT OF B EDRCSIR ^mRYQF3)\s^ssRv; Pursuedtqthe rtr e\r.p.ht-h3^"Th\e Rpperv\e^\sie\see3s Hftc °F PHQStCuTxan ^EcRuSETHE PiPPE.\JlRRT - pETVmRER, '^L^uimnR Pa&gfys n«S FfNLEDTO PftYTREFlUnjS ^ ThDCfcEmS 4R&. PEE(S>> TDT\fcTj\5TR\rY tauRT mvYHm the y\mt p\xE3 3^ the Rrve tsV > EFFEcTWE 3iECE«\3E3 ^CyTHj^ZD, ^R\j\ajT,S«UT\ 3>l - IRRCTER POYA-ftffcD, t.^Ep^YV CVERYs fBRTHE EGURT r 3Y 3HREC-TVOR ^VsESY\DR (s') P P ESERtE3» 7. OF
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Daryl DeWayne Riggins
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
PetitionOppositionAmicus (cert)Petitioner briefRespondent briefAmicus (for pet./neither)Amicus (for resp.)Reply (merits)Reply / otherProcedural
Oct 04 2021
Petition DENIED.
Jun 24 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
Apr 12 2021
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 4, 2021)