Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Clement Mosseri
IFP petition
Questions presented
-
Is petitioner entitled to a fair hearing before an unbiased tribunal?
-
Does a poor person, Pro se litigant have a right to an attorney without costs if that tribunal discriminates and will not give a fair hearing unless he is represented by an attorney?
-
Does the SDNY and its judges have a right to discriminate against litigants by having a separate process for unrepresented litigants they call Pro se Intake while attorneys have access to the Clerk’s Office in a separate building and where judges have different rules for pro se litigants than attorneys denying fundamental rights for unrepressed pro se litigants?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Clement Mosseri
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jun 24 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Mar 22 2021Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2021)