Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Clement Mosseri

IFP petition


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021

Questions presented

  1. Is petitioner entitled to a fair hearing before an unbiased tribunal?

  2. Does a poor person, Pro se litigant have a right to an attorney without costs if that tribunal discriminates and will not give a fair hearing unless he is represented by an attorney?

  3. Does the SDNY and its judges have a right to discriminate against litigants by having a separate process for unrepresented litigants they call Pro se Intake while attorneys have access to the Clerk’s Office in a separate building and where judges have different rules for pro se litigants than attorneys denying fundamental rights for unrepressed pro se litigants?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Clement Mosseri

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 24 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Mar 22 2021
    Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2021)