Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Edward Shane West-El v. Mark J. Baker

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 20-12126 · judgment January 21, 2021

Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021

Questions presented

  1. In Earle v McVeigh, 91 US 503,23 L Ed 398, it says “ Every person is entitled to an opportunity to be heard in a court of law upon every question involving his rights or interests, before he is affected by any judicial decision on the question.” Why is the Petitioner not being heard as of yet?

  2. The Petitioner would like to know the reason why taxes were being deducted from his pay check, Secondly is the Petitioner getting the correct pay per hour as well as overtime, being the employee started work as a longshoremen in or around November 1996?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Edward Shane West-El

For respondent
Rachelle Barston
Maersk Services USA

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 17 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Jun 16 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent Mark J. Baker to respond filed.
    Main Document
  4. Mar 01 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2021)
    Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service