Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Nazir Khan, et al. v. Merit Medical Systems Inc., et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2019-1952, 2019-2394 · judgment August 13, 2020


Certiorari denied · May 17, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c)(2) provides that a motion for sanctions “must be served under Rule 5, but it must not be filed or be presented to the court if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets.” The Federal Circuit affirmed the grant of a motion for Rule 11 sanctions and the award of $95,966.90 in attorney fees against pro se litigants Nazir Khan and Iftikhar Khan (collectively “Khan”), despite the movants’ undisputed failure to serve Khan with the motion for sanctions at any time prior to filing the motion. The question presented is as follows: Whether—in line with holdings from the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits—a motion for Rule 11 sanctions may be granted only if the motion is served more than 21 days before filing, as required by Rule 11(c)(2); or whether a Rule 11 motion may instead be granted despite the movants’ failure to serve the motion prior to filing, as the Seventh and Federal Circuits have held.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jonathan Alan Herstoff
Haug Partners LLP

For respondent
Brian David Schmalzbach
McGuireWoods LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Related
Vide, 20-1363

Proceedings

  1. May 17 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 27 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
  3. Apr 13 2021
    Reply of petitioners Nazir Khan, et al. filed.
  4. Mar 25 2021
    Brief of respondents Merit Medical Systems, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Feb 01 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 25, 2021, for all respondents.
  6. Jan 29 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 25, 2021 to March 25, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Jan 26 2021
    Response Requested. (Due February 25, 2021)
  8. Jan 13 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
  9. Jan 05 2021
    Waiver of right of respondents Mark Grove, M.D., and Javier Alvarez-Tostado, M.D. to respond filed.
  10. Dec 11 2020
    Letter pursuant to Rule 12.6 from counsel for petitioners filed.
  11. Dec 08 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent Merit Medical Systems, Inc. et al. to respond filed.
  12. Dec 01 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 6, 2021)