Steven Ivey v. Richard Corcoran

QUESTIONS(S) PRESENTED Question 1: Is the present Florida education system of 'separate but equal' county education districts with no central state FL DOE oversight a form of segregation making it a violation of'Brown v. Board of Education', (US S. Ct. 1954), because with 'Brown' 'Plessy v. Ferguson' was determined to be unconstitutional in education systems? Question 2: Is it unconstitutional in a complaint of discrimination within a federally funded work training education program for the Florida Department of Education,(FL DOE), to use Florida Constitution Art. IX 4(b) and Florida Statutes 1001.42 (4)(h), 1001.33, 1001.42(5)(a), & 1012.22(1) for dismissal in Florida Second Circuit Court citing that these state authorities jusitfy that the FL DOE does not have jurisdiction over the claims even though a plaintiff filed the complaint and used support citing the US Civil Rights Act/Codes of 1964, (Title VI & VII), 42 U.S.C.2000 for protection, processing and relief? Question 3: Is it proper due process as per the due process clause of the Fift Amendment of the US Constitution for FL DOE through Florida Second Circuit Court to use Florida Constitution Art. IX 4(b) and Florida Statutes 1001.42 (4)(h), 1001.33, 1001.42(5)(a), & 1012.22(1) in place of the US Civil Rights Act/Codes of 1964, Title VII, 42 U.S.C.2000 for decisions in a case of US Civil Rights violations? Question 4: Considering Questions 2 & 3, a resulting question is do the Florida state authorities of Florida Constitution Art. IX 4(b), and Florida Statutes 1001.42 (4)(h), 1001.33, 1001.42(5)(a), & 1012.22(1) provide equivalent and sufficient substitutions for the federal authorities of the US Civil Rights Act/ Codes of 1964, Title VI & VII, 42 U.S.C.2000 and the Federal Rules of Civil Proceture when both are used in Florida court decisions of individual Civil Rights and the federal authorities for the required adherence to distribution, protection, and processing of federal education funds?