Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
South Bay United Pentecostal Church, et al. v. Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-55533
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Once again, Petitioners South Bay United Pentecostal Church and Bishop Arthur Hodges III (“South Bay”) must seek relief from this Court. California, in revising its reopening restrictions under a new “Blueprint” framework, exacerbates its discrimination and disparate treatment toward Places of Worship. While millions of Californians in a range of industries resumed business while observing mask-wearing and social distancing protocols, church services remain a disfavored activity in the eyes of the State and the County of San Diego. Similar scenarios playing out in other states generated a myriad of cases requesting stays and injunctions, several of which rose through appellate courts and were submitted to this Court for review. Lower courts are divided as to the constitutional standard for reviewing Free Exercise challenges to pandemic restrictions. Courts in the Fifth and Sixth Circuits have upheld claims under the Free Exercise Clause, applying strict scrutiny review, while Courts in the Second, Seventh, and Ninth circuits have rejected such claims, often relying in part on this Court’s decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts as justification for their excessive deference to the State. The Questions Presented are: 1. Do Governor Newsom’s lockdown orders and reopening restrictions under the “Blueprint” framework, placing strict limitations, including closures, on all Places of Worship in California,
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Charles S. LiMandri
LiMandri & Jonna LLP
For respondent
Samuel Thomas Harbourt
Cal. Dept. of Justice, Office of Solicitor General
Proceedings
- May 28 2021JUDGMENT ISSUED.
- Apr 26 2021Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Tandon v. Newsom, 593 U. S. ___ (2021) (per curiam).
- Apr 15 2021Letter of April 15, 2021 from petitioner South Bay United Pentecostal Church filed.
- Apr 12 2021Letter of April 12, 2021 from counsel for respondents filed.
- Apr 07 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
- Apr 06 2021Reply of petitioners South Bay United Pentecostal Church, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 18 2021Brief of respondents Gavin Newsom, et al. in opposition filed.
- Mar 18 2021Brief of respondents San Diego County Defendants' in opposition filed.
- Feb 05 2021Application (20A136) referred to the Court.
- Feb 05 2021The application for injunctive relief presented to JUSTICE KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is granted in part. Respondents are enjoined from enforcing the Blueprint’s Tier 1 prohibition on indoor worship services against the applicants pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari. The application is denied with respect to the percentage capacity limitations, and respondents are not en-joined from imposing a 25% capacity limitation on indoor worship services in Tier 1. The application is denied with respect to the prohibition on singing and chanting during indoor services. This order is without prejudice to the applicants presenting new evidence to the District Court that the State is not applying the percentage capacity limitations or the prohibition on singing and chanting in a generally applicable manner. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this order shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE GORSUCH would grant the application in full. JUSTICE ALITO would grant the application with respect to all of the capacity restrictions on indoor worship services and the prohibition against indoor singing and chanting, and would stay for 30 days an injunction against the percentage attendance caps and the prohibition against indoor singing and chanting. (See Detached Opinion). CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, concurring in the partial grant of application for injunctive relief. (Detached Opinion). JUSTICE BARRETT, with whom JUSTICE KAVANAUGH joins, concurring in the partial grant of application for injunctive relief. (Detached Opinion). Statement of JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE ALITO join. (Detached Opinion). JUSTICE KAGAN, with whom
- Jan 30 2021Letter of applicants South Bay United Pentecostal Church, et al. filed.
- Jan 30 2021Reply of applicants South Bay United Pentecostal Church, et al. filed.
- Jan 29 2021Response to application from respondents Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, et al. filed.
- Jan 29 2021Response to application from respondents Wilma J. Wooten, et al. filed.
- Jan 29 2021Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.
- Jan 27 2021Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, et al.
- Jan 26 2021Response to application (20A136) requested by Justice Kagan, due Friday, January 29, by 5 p.m. ET.
- Jan 26 2021Letter Re: Notice of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Ruling of South Bay United Pentecostal Church, et al. not accepted for filing. (March 25, 2021)
- Jan 25 2021Application (20A136) for injunctive relief, submitted to Justice Kagan.
- Jan 22 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 18, 2021.
- Jan 20 2021Response to motion from petitioner South Bay United Pentecostal Church, et al. filed.
- Jan 19 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 16, 2021 to March 18, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 14 2021Response Requested. (Due February 16, 2021)
- Jan 06 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
- Dec 30 2020Waiver of right of respondents William D. Gore, Helen Robbins-Meyer, Dr. Wilma J. Wooten to respond filed.
- Dec 24 2020Waiver of right of respondents Gavin Newsom, et al. to respond filed.
- Nov 24 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 30, 2020)