Don Arthur Webster, Jr. v. United States District Court for the District of Alaska

Questions Pfessmteo CO Doss PACSAtL- B/A£> D/SPoPPoP-T/OX/ALLY AFFECT T/PE FeOEPAL Cocf/ITS TREATMENT OF AdAFO/NAL/ZED PEOPLE OF COLOfLf WFEA/ ADDPESS///6 TEE /N/EPa/FT/OOAL TBEATf ASPECT OF /B U<S.C, & /E9/ /A/ jPELAT/O/J TO TEE POJ2ELY Local B&m/nAl Conduct of PFqs T/tl/t/o/U f 60 XSXT A MATTEL Of NATIONAL /PipOLjAA/CE AND DpNSTLTUTONAL WOIATTO/J 1NHEN TPEN/NTN C/PCOfT PAOCEDLE PALE/ PEFUSES TO ADDRESS ALL /SSUES PA/SEO CONCERN' LDD /e> a s. £ f /r^ because of xtx /nnebbnt a/atwle To D)SPOPPoPT/ONA TEL Y AFFECT AND PaC/ALLY DLSCP/M/EA7E AoAf/SST 3lac/l Aatep/cans f ® Xs XT AN /SSU E OF A/AT/OA/FL /ATPOFTeNCE INMFPE ALC CltlCUfT COUP-7 OF APPEALS FA/L TO APPLY TEE PeLeUANT Lae cnanne to all cases /ni/o/wne tee eedemc Ce/wZEAL STATUTE TEAT /S pAET OF A T^EATf, /& U&C. f /E9/f Doss Tpp&SE 7>EC/S/oaT3 BEPaPT FPOM TtfE EXPECTED AND USUAL COU2SE OF Xl/O/C/AL pBOCEED/NC? \JFeRE A CAW P/AS unsettled at tp/al Sot Became settled on D/pfct PehewI M Dan tneexecutive sqanofs Powef t# mate tpfat/es aa/d TPE/Uph CcELsCESS'S PcWEp. i/HDEfL APT. X (u, 3. CoESZ J, PEAUiAlE PuPELT LOCAL CP/M/NAL CONDUCT? D®£$ TEAT LAND OF pESTPA/ATf On TEE TAXAT Y pONEF C&JFL/dC \E/TE 7AE ESN 7PAU ?&FP &?N~ djPESS'S OMCTE/X PEACH of THE EXCUTfs/E’S TREATY PcaAEP t f