Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

William Kinney Jr., et al. v. Urban Housing Development, LLC

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Oregon, No. A174061 · judgment August 25, 2020

Certiorari denied · January 11, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

  1. This Court often emphasizes the importance of preserving the public’s trust in the legal system. But over the past decade, courts have left the public and homeowners with questionable decisions and actions that have marred the system. Unfortunately, millions harmed are average American’s, their families and friends. Every American has been affected, as these outcomes have had a lasting negative effect on the economy and wealth, including record poverty, homelessness, health care costs, low wage jobs and government assistance, while infringing on Constitutional Rights. Herein, there are numerous questionable issues by the courts and others in favor of the numerous banks and lenders in this case, particularly HSBC Pic, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS), the government’s interest in MERS, and U.S. Bank NA, the alleged note owner. This case raises important issues over the government’s direct financial interest in trillions of dollars’ in taxpayer backed mortgages, FNMA as de facto State actor, national banks, mortgage securitization (RMBS), default insurance (CDSs and CDOs), Constitutional property rights, foreclosure and modification fraud, standing and void judgements in need of addressing. This case raises questions of Constitutionality of Oregon law that infringes on Due Process under Amendment V. Thus, the questions presented are: .^-

Counsel of record

For petitioner
William Kinney Jr.

For respondent
Mark G. Passannante
Broer + Passannante, P.S.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 11 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 16 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
  3. Dec 07 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent Urban Housing Development to respond filed.
  4. Nov 14 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2020)