Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lih Bin Shih v. Nathan Brooks Parnell
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, No. D074805 · judgment March 25, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether the Court may deny Petitioner’s First Amendment right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances? In particular when the Government had recognized the petition as credible and accepted for redress. Whether the Court may terminate Petitioner’s right to communicate with Government and hinder investigation?
-
Whether the Court may make thorough omission of all dirty hands evidence by Respondents and not apply the Clean Hands Doctrine to foreclose Respondents seeking relief? Whether the Court may consider eight real-time and well-timed false 911 calls and false police reports prior to trial for retaliation not dirty enough to invoke equitable defense for Petitioner? In particular, police was not a witness at trial after Respondents’ extensive involvement of police, and Respondents provided no defense to Petitioner’s allegations that all 911 calls and police reports were false.
-
Whether the Court may deny Petitioner’s due process guaranteed in the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments to silence Petitioner by refusing to accept even one page of evidence at trial, by disposing two cases without recess in 45 minutes, by depriving Petitioner’s right to defend against Respondents’ claim, and by eliminating the statutory compliant lawful oral record?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lih-Bin Shih
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 25 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jan 06 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
- Nov 10 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2020)