Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Michael Shock v. Arkansas
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Arkansas, No. CR-19-532 · judgment March 11, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Are significant discovery and Brady violations by the prosecuting attorney, necessitating the grant of a mistrial, sufficient to invoke the double jeopardy protections against “goading” as set forth in Oregon v. Kennedy?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jeffrey Marx Rosenzweig
For respondent
Michael Anthony Cantrell
Office of the Arkansas Attorney General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, January 11, 2021 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Jan 11 2021Petition DENIED.
- Dec 23 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
- Dec 17 2020Waiver of right of respondent Arkansas to respond filed.
- Nov 12 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 17, 2020)