Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Tito Michael Uzodinma v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 18-3437 · judgment March 5, 2020

Certiorari denied · April 19, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Nadia Anguiano-Wehde
James H. Binger Center for New Americans

For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Apr 19 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Mar 31 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
  3. Mar 30 2021
    Reply of petitioner Tito Uzodinma filed. (Distributed)
  4. Mar 17 2021
    Brief of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General in opposition filed.
  5. Feb 01 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 17, 2021.
  6. Jan 29 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 16, 2021 to March 17, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Jan 11 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 16, 2021. See Rule 30.1.
  8. Jan 08 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 15, 2021 to February 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Dec 07 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2021.
  10. Dec 04 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2020 to January 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  11. Nov 09 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2020)
  12. Nov 09 2020
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submnitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.