Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Lyle Mark Coultas v. Carroll Tichenor, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Yamhill County Prosecutor, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-35421 · judgment June 10, 2020


Certiorari denied · December 7, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

1 Can the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals disregard the United States District Court Judge Marco Hernandez intentional fabrication of facts and law as he clearly did in his decision, and did Judge Marco Hernandez fraud on the court by doing so? 2 Does the United States Supreme Court have the legal authority to void a circuit court conviction that is obtained by intentional fraud on the court? 3 When a Citizen of the United States of America is the victim of fraud on the court by the County Prosecutor and a State police crime lab detective, then the fraud is concealed by the County Circuit Court the District Court and then the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, how does the United States Supreme Court correct this fraud on the court? 4 Can a Circuit Court Judge or a District Court Judge fabricate facts that do not exist and base a dismissal of that case based on the fabricated facts?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Lyle Mark Coultas

For respondent
Benjamin Noah Gutman
Oregon Department of Justice

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Feb 22 2021
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Jan 20 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
  3. Dec 28 2020
    Petition for Rehearing filed.
  4. Dec 07 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  5. Nov 17 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
  6. Nov 10 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent Carroll Tichenor, et al. to respond filed.
  7. Oct 29 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)