Tatyana E. Drevaleva v. California Department of Industrial Relations

Does the Opposing Party the Governmental Entity the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) have a right to refuse to transfer the record that is related to DIR’s processes of investigation of my both retaliation and unlawful termination claim and my wage claim to the Office of the Administrative Hearings of the California Department of General Services at my request pursuant to the California Administrative Procedure Act or Government Code Sections 11370.5(a) and 11500 et. seq.?

If there are two actions that are pending in both the District Court and the State Court and that include the same Parties, the same events, and the same causes of action, shall the State Court evaluate the facts and the pieces of evidence that are presented from the District Court and from the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit?

If the Opposing Party the Governmental Entity the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) exhibits clear inconsistencies and discrepancies during the litigations at both the District and the State Court, if DIR doesn’t mention the key piece of evidence (the alleged September 4, 2013 email of Ms. Llittlepage) during the litigation at the District Court, if DIR opposes my attempt to introduce this September 4, 2013 Littlepage’s email to the 9th Circuit, and if at the same time DIR uses the same September 4, 2013 Littlepage’s email as a basis for DIR’s anti-SLAPP Motion and the Demurrer Page 2 of 59