Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General v. Wilson N. Guadalupe

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 19-2239 · judgment February 26, 2020

Certiorari denied · June 21, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 13% cert probability (95% interval 8%–20%)

Before the decision, about 3× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a federal-government petitioner, a Third Circuit decision below, and counsel who has filed here before.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General

For respondent
Judy Resnick
Law Office of Marcia Kasdan

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Jun 21 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 01 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
  3. May 13 2021
    Brief of respondent Wilson N. Guadalupe in opposition filed.
  4. Apr 12 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 19, 2021.
  5. Mar 23 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 19, 2021 to May 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. Mar 18 2021
    Response Requested. (Due April 19, 2021)
  7. Mar 10 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
  8. Dec 31 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 16, 2021. (Docket entry corrected 2/16/21. See Rule 30.1)
  9. Dec 16 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2020 to February 14, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  10. Nov 19 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 16, 2020.
  11. Nov 16 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2020 to December 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  12. Oct 16 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)
  13. Oct 16 2020
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in ths case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.