Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Nathaniel Richard Hull v. Jeffrey J. Rockwell
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 19-2074 · judgment July 30, 2020
Before the decision, about 2.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a First Circuit decision below, a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Question presented
Virtually every State has a “homestead exemption” that shields a debtor’s home from attachment and execution. Most States also permit the debtor to sell his or her home and buy a new one within a limited time (say, six months). But if the debtor fails to timely reinvest, the exemption expires and creditors can attach or execute upon the proceeds. The Bankruptcy Code incorporates “State or local law that is applicable on the date of the filing of the petition” to determine what property is exempt from distribution to creditors. 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(3). In conflict with the Ninth Circuit and Fifth Circuit, the First Circuit held that, inside bankruptcy, a homestead exemption can never expire even if it would have expired under applicable state law outside bankruptcy. That decision enables debtors to permanently shield proceeds from bankruptcy creditors even after the debtor sold the home, the reinvestment period elapsed, and the money is being kept as cash. The question presented is: Whether a debtor may keep a state-law homestead exemption inside bankruptcy, notwithstanding that the proceeds would be subject to attachment and execution outside bankruptcy because the debtor sold the home and the exemption expired under applicable state law. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Zachary D. Tripp
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
For respondent
Daniel L. Geyser
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 22 2021Petition DENIED.
- Feb 03 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
- Feb 02 2021Reply of petitioner Nathaniel Richard Hull filed. (Distributed)
- Jan 19 2021Brief of respondent Jeffrey J. Rockwell in opposition filed.
- Jan 13 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 19, 2021.
- Jan 12 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 15, 2021 to January 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Nov 12 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2021.
- Nov 10 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2020 to January 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Oct 13 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)