Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Nathaniel Richard Hull v. Jeffrey J. Rockwell

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 19-2074 · judgment July 30, 2020


Certiorari denied · February 22, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 11% cert probability (95% interval 7%–18%)

Before the decision, about 2.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a First Circuit decision below, a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.

Question presented

Virtually every State has a “homestead exemption” that shields a debtor’s home from attachment and execution. Most States also permit the debtor to sell his or her home and buy a new one within a limited time (say, six months). But if the debtor fails to timely reinvest, the exemption expires and creditors can attach or execute upon the proceeds. The Bankruptcy Code incorporates “State or local law that is applicable on the date of the filing of the petition” to determine what property is exempt from distribution to creditors. 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(3). In conflict with the Ninth Circuit and Fifth Circuit, the First Circuit held that, inside bankruptcy, a homestead exemption can never expire even if it would have expired under applicable state law outside bankruptcy. That decision enables debtors to permanently shield proceeds from bankruptcy creditors even after the debtor sold the home, the reinvestment period elapsed, and the money is being kept as cash. The question presented is: Whether a debtor may keep a state-law homestead exemption inside bankruptcy, notwithstanding that the proceeds would be subject to attachment and execution outside bankruptcy because the debtor sold the home and the exemption expired under applicable state law. (i)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Zachary D. Tripp
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

For respondent
Daniel L. Geyser
Haynes and Boone, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Feb 22 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 03 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
  3. Feb 02 2021
    Reply of petitioner Nathaniel Richard Hull filed. (Distributed)
  4. Jan 19 2021
    Brief of respondent Jeffrey J. Rockwell in opposition filed.
  5. Jan 13 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 19, 2021.
  6. Jan 12 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 15, 2021 to January 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Nov 12 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2021.
  8. Nov 10 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2020 to January 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Oct 13 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)