Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Sangeeta Bhargava v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, No. H044982 · judgment March 20, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Are forgery and robo-signing one and the same?
-
Is it a violation of due process and equal protection of the law to forbid a victim of forgery to use the judicial process in order to prevent his loss?
-
Is it a violation of due process and equal protection of law to require that a victim must wait until unlawful and fraudulent foreclosure, dispossession, and eviction are complete to seek redress in the Courts, particularly when this occurs under the auspices of and with the procedure of state law?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Thomas John Spielbauer
The Spielbauer Law Office
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 11 2021Petition DENIED.
- Dec 02 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
- Nov 13 2020Supplemental brief of petitioner Sangeeta Bhargava filed.
- Oct 09 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)