Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Artem Koshkalda v. Seiko Epson Corporation, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-15124 · judgment December 27, 2019

Certiorari denied · December 14, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.

Questions presented

  1. Did The United States District Court District of Nevada (hereinafter “NV Court”) err in its Report and Recommendation Order For Case Terminating Sanctions (hereinafter “RORA”) and in its order adopting it?

  2. Did United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (hereinafter “Ninth Circuit”) err in affirming NV Court’s orders?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Artem Koshkalda

For respondent
Annie Shou-Chi Wang
Wang Law Corporation

Case

Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Order
Order list, December 14, 2020 · Certiorari denied

Proceedings

  1. Dec 14 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 24 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
  3. Nov 16 2020
    Reply of petitioner Artem Koshkalda filed. (Distributed)
  4. Nov 10 2020
    Brief of respondents Seiko Epson Corporation, et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Jul 16 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2020)