Jesse Louis Kaiser v. Anthony R. Morfitt, Assistant United States Attorney

The Court lacks subject matter and personal jurisdiction for the reasons below.

1. This Court, and all public offices, is defined under FRCP Rule 40) as a FOREIGN STATE, and as defined under TITLE 28-JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE The Sovereign Immunities Act (F’SIA) of 1976 is a United States law, codified at Title 28,1330,1332,13910,1441 (d), and 1602-1611, and is being jurisdictionally challenged, and “full disclosure” of the “true” jurisdiction of this Court has been asked but has stayed silent’?

2. Any failure to disclose the true jurisdiction is a violation of 15 Statues at Large, this was passed to remove the people of the United States of America from the federal citizenship under the 14th amendment. Chapter 249 (section 1), enacted July, 1868?

3. It is the court’s responsibility to prove it has subject matter jurisdiction, and where a judge arbitrarily claims the court has jurisdiction. He is violating the defendant’s right to due process of the law. It is, in fact, the plaintiffs responsibility to prove, on the record. That jurisdiction exists, and jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, even years later, and even collaterally, as in a private administrative process, as was done herein.