Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Takhir Ashirovich Khaytekov v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 19-3149 · judgment December 16, 2019

GVR'd · May 3, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jeremy Charles Marwell
Vinson & Elkins LLP

For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Jun 04 2021
    JUDGMENT ISSUED.
  2. May 03 2021
    Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 593 U. S. ___ (2021).
  3. Apr 29 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
  4. Nov 17 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
  5. Nov 12 2020
    Reply of petitioner Takhir Khaytekov filed.
  6. Oct 26 2020
    Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until November 17, 2020 granted.
  7. Oct 22 2020
    Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from November 4, 2020 to November 17, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Oct 16 2020
    Brief of respondent William P. Barr, Attorney General filed.
  9. Sep 21 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 16, 2020.
  10. Sep 18 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 21, 2020 to October 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  11. Aug 10 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 21, 2020.
  12. Aug 07 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 19, 2020 to September 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  13. Jul 15 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 19, 2020)
  14. Jul 15 2020
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.