Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re David A. Golden
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether the 9th Circuit and Western Washington District Ct. have abused their discretion by dismissing Plaintiffs False Claims complaint and appeal, with no hearing and no relief, after fraud and perjury were proven against USDOJ, and the crime was proven by the 9th Circuit’s own case law?
-
Whether the Contract Clause of the US Constitution (Art. I § 10 Clause 1) invalidates the False Claims Act and other state legislation (SB 5987)?
-
Whether the 1st, 5th, and 14th Amendments (and Art. I § 7 of the Washington State Constitution) invalidate this same legislation, if petitioner has already shown the Courts below that the challenged legislation (SB 5987.) is obtained by the Defendants’ abuse of the police state?
-
Whether the 9th Circuit and the District Ct. have abused their discretion in refusing to apply a strict scrutiny standard to petitioner’s complaint?
-
Whether the 9th Circuit and the District Ct. have abused their discretion by refusing to award sanctions against USDOJ?
-
Whether USDOJ, the 9th Circuit, and US District Court are unable to perform their ministerial duty of enforcing the “Rule of Law” because of political motivations?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David A. Golden
For respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Dec 07 2020Rehearing DENIED.
- Nov 10 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
- Oct 29 2020Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Oct 05 2020Petition DENIED.
- Aug 19 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
- Aug 14 2020Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jul 06 2020Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)