Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Richard Louis Arnold Phillips v. Kevin Chappell, Warden, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-16790 · judgment September 26, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
RICHARD LOUIS ARNOLD PHILLIPS (Phillips), filing pro se, raises a 'standing' question heretofore unanswered by this Court. In Heck v- Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 at 486-487 (1994) this Court held ,e[a) §1983 plaintiff must prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed[.] (Emphasis added.) I. Is a plaintiff 'Heck barred from seeking §1983 relief, when his conviction is partially reversed — thus vacating the only sentence imposed — but part of the conviction remains intact? i•
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Richard L. A. Phillips
For respondent
Neah Huynh
Office of the Attorney General State of California
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 02 2020Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Oct 07 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
- Sep 30 2020Waiver of right of respondents Kevin Chappell, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
- Apr 28 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2020)