Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. v. Shawn Jensen, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-16358, 18-16365, 18-16368,18-16424 · judgment January 29, 2020


Certiorari denied · January 11, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a state or local-government petitioner, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and counsel who has filed here before.

Question presented

The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) prescribes precisely how to calculate an award of attorneys’ fees in prisoner cases. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d). This Court and several circuit courts have recognized that the PLRA’s fee formula, not the traditional lodestar method, applies and limits a district court’s discretion to award more than what it expressly authorizes. The Ninth Circuit, however, followed its own precedent and held that a district court retains the discretion to enhance a fee award, notwithstanding the PLRA’s limitations. The question presented is whether the PLRA leaves any room for a district court to enhance a fee award in prisoner cases beyond what it statutorily prescribes.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Nicholas D. Acedo
Struck Love Bojanowski & Acedo, PLC

For respondent
David Cyrus Fathi
American Civil Liberties Union

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 11 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 23 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
  3. Dec 18 2020
    Reply of petitioners David Shinn, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  4. Dec 08 2020
    Brief of respondents Shawn Jensen, et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Oct 06 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including December 9, 2020.
  6. Oct 05 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 19, 2020 to December 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Sep 14 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)