Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Richard J. Kelly, et ux. v. Marjory Motiaytis
Paid petition · Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District, No. 2-18-0599 · judgment September 17, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Just laws and constitutional la ws are the foundation of our legal system. We, the people, DEPEND on the United States Supreme Court for justice. (1) Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 is unconstitutionally vague in violation of the due process clauses of the 14th and 5th Amendments of the United States Constitution? (APPENDIX F) Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 is unconstitutionally vague and is, therefore, unconstitutional both on its face and as allied? (2) Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 violates the due process clauses of the 14th and 5th Amendments of the United States Constitution? (APPENDIX F) Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 violates the due process clause of the 14th and 5tk Amendments of the United States Constitution and is, therefore, unconstitutional both on its face and as applied? (3) .Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 violates the due process clause of the 14th and 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution when it is necessary to refer to and to utilize another statute in order to determine the “prohibited conduct”? Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 is unconstitutionally vague when it is necessary to refer to and to utilize another statute in order to determine the “prohibited conduct?’and is, therefore, unconstitutional both on its face and as applied*! in
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Richard J. Kelly
For respondent
Amy Lynn Lonergan
Finn & Finn, Ltd
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 09 2020Petition DENIED.
- Oct 21 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
- Oct 07 2020Waiver of right of respondent Marjory Motiaytis to respond filed.
- Sep 02 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 14, 2020)