Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Richard J. Kelly, et ux. v. Marjory Motiaytis

Paid petition · Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District, No. 2-18-0599 · judgment September 17, 2019


Certiorari denied · November 9, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Just laws and constitutional la ws are the foundation of our legal system. We, the people, DEPEND on the United States Supreme Court for justice. (1) Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 is unconstitutionally vague in violation of the due process clauses of the 14th and 5th Amendments of the United States Constitution? (APPENDIX F) Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 is unconstitutionally vague and is, therefore, unconstitutional both on its face and as allied? (2) Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 violates the due process clauses of the 14th and 5th Amendments of the United States Constitution? (APPENDIX F) Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 violates the due process clause of the 14th and 5tk Amendments of the United States Constitution and is, therefore, unconstitutional both on its face and as applied? (3) .Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 violates the due process clause of the 14th and 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution when it is necessary to refer to and to utilize another statute in order to determine the “prohibited conduct”? Whether 65 ILCS 5/11-13-15 is unconstitutionally vague when it is necessary to refer to and to utilize another statute in order to determine the “prohibited conduct?’and is, therefore, unconstitutional both on its face and as applied*! in

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Richard J. Kelly

For respondent
Amy Lynn Lonergan
Finn & Finn, Ltd

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Nov 09 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Oct 21 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
  3. Oct 07 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent Marjory Motiaytis to respond filed.
  4. Sep 02 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 14, 2020)