Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Peter J. Barclay v. Oregon Department of Justice, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-35045 · judgment March 25, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Will this Court exercise its supervisory powers against lower court judgments which expressly hold the stare decisis of this Court “irrelevant” and where the lower courts disregard this Court’s stare decisis by refusing to hold state judges culpable for committing manifest violations of U.S. sovereignty in the face of the clear statutes and this courts cases that strip state judges of authority? Will this Court exercise its supervisory powers against lower court judgments that deny enforcement of statutory injunctions rendering the enlistment contract and protective weight of the U.S. Constitution worthless? Additional Dependent Questions Presented For Review under 28 U. S. C. § 2101(e) Does res judicata of family law courts prohibit enforcing preemption in existing cases of federal disability benefits, post 1989?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Peter J. Barclay
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 16 2020Petition DENIED.
- Oct 28 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
- Sep 03 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)