Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Richard Balter v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 19-6741 · judgment December 23, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Does the Virginia Medical Malpractice Act’s requirement that a plaintiff possess a written opinion signed by an expert witness that, based upon a reasonable understanding of the facts, the defendant for whom service of process has been requested deviated from the applicable standard of care and the deviation was a proximate cause of the injuries claimed apply to a medical malpractice claim brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Richard Balter
For respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 11 2021Petition DENIED.
- Dec 09 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
- Nov 25 2020Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Oct 16 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 25, 2020.
- Oct 15 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 26, 2020 to November 25, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 31 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 26, 2020.
- Aug 28 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2020 to October 26, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 19 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2020)