Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Akbar Ghaneh Fard v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 18-13621 · judgment February 4, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
In competitive government procurement programs, does a government contractor “defraud” the Government by practicing conservatism in the bidding process and reasonably overstating estimates for proposed cost items?
-
Does any alleged misrepresentation in obtaining a government procurement contract through set-aside program transform a contract into a “government benefit” akin to a grant or an entitlement program payment, for the purpose of loss and restitution calculation, as opposed to a classic procurement fraud, which should be treated under the general rule for loss calculation?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Akbar Ghaneh Fard
For respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2020Petition DENIED.
- Sep 02 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
- Aug 27 2020Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Aug 17 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2020)