Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Robert Massie v. Basilea Mena

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-15214 · judgment February 26, 2020


Certiorari denied · January 11, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 6% cert probability (95% interval 4%–8%)

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).

Question presented

In the early morning of June 22, 2016, Respondent Basilea Mena and her boyfriend, Jacob Tellez, both admittedly intoxicated, got into a domestic argument on their way home from an evening of beer drinking. They ended up by a palm tree on a traffic median in the middle of Speedway Boulevard, a six-lane arterial street in central Tucson, where they continued arguing. Officer Robert Massie, Petitioner here, contacted Mena and Tellez. Massie wanted Tellez and Mena off the traffic median, and separated, as soon as possible, for their own, officer, and public safety, and to allow investigation through individual interviews. After Mena was uncooperative for about three minutes, repeatedly refusing to provide identification or to move away from Tellez, Massie decided to detain her in handcuffs and move her off the median. When Massie attempted to handcuff Mena using only his own physical strength, Mena resisted by jerking her arm, and Massie’s body weight pushed or pressed her forward into the palm tree. Mena suffered superficial scrapes and abrasions. Both the district court and the Ninth Circuit denied Massie qualified immunity regarding Mena’s excessive force claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Massie therefore presents the following questions for review: (1) Under the particular facts and circumstances of this case, did the Ninth Circuit err in finding

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Dennis Patrick McLaughlin
City of Tucson Attorney's Office

For respondent
Tillman J. Breckenridge
Stris & Maher LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Jan 11 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 02 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
  3. Nov 24 2020
    Reply of petitioner Robert Massie filed.
  4. Nov 12 2020
    Brief of respondent Basilea Mena in opposition filed.
  5. Oct 16 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 20, 2020.
  6. Oct 15 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 21, 2020 to November 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Oct 13 2020
    Motion of Basilea Mena for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (October 14, 2020 - Corrected letter to be submitted)
  8. Sep 21 2020
    Response Requested. (Due October 21, 2020)
  9. Sep 09 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
  10. Sep 03 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent Basilea Mena to respond filed.
  11. Aug 18 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 21, 2020)