Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Peter R. Culpepper
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Whether, under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), respondent-chancellor abused her discretion in applying the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act (“the Act”) when the FAA was expressly mandated by petitioner’s Employment Agreement as drafted by counsel for appellee-respondent, providing for a clear and established legal right to be enforced in petitioner’s filed application for the purpose of seeking vacatur of his arbitration award under the FAA as opposed to the Act.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Peter Culpepper
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 4, 2021 · Mandamus denied
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Aug 11 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 21 2021Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due July 26, 2021)