Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Pasadena Republican Club v. Western Justice Center, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-55093 · judgment January 25, 2021


Certiorari denied · October 12, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and counsel who has filed here before.

Questions presented

The City of Pasadena entered into a lease with the Western Justice Center, which including the option to renew runs for 99 years, to operate a center for dispute resolution on property owned by the City. City funds were used to purchase the property from the United States General Services Administration – only a governmental entity could legally purchase the property – and revenue from city bonds was given to the Western Justice Center to pay for the refurbishment of the property. The property was purchased to carry out the public purposes of the City and the City limited its use to purposes stated in a Plan of Public Use. The City relied on rent payments from the Western Justice Center to repay the City’s treasury for the cost of the purchase and the refurbishment financed by the sale of municipal bonds. The Western Justice Center exercised its delegated authority over that City-owned property to cancel an event by the Pasadena Republican Club because Center disagreed with the view of the speaker chosen by the Club The questions presented for review is under these circumstances are:

  1. While it is managing the city-owned property, is the Western Justice Center a State Actor for purposes of the First and Fourteenth Amendments and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3)?

  2. Consistent with the Court’s ruling in Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715 (1961), is a government agency liable for civil rights violations where the agency, through “inaction has not only made itself a party to the [viewpoint discrimination] but has elected to place its power, property and prestige behind” that discrimination?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Anthony Thomas Caso
Constitutional Counsel Group

For respondent
Dawn Cushman
Bradley & Gmelich LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Oct 12 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Sep 15 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
  3. Sep 14 2021
    Reply of petitioner Pasadena Republican Club filed. (Distributed)
  4. Sep 01 2021
    Brief of respondents Western Justice Center and Judith Chirlin in opposition filed.
  5. Sep 01 2021
    Response to petition from respondent City of Pasadena filed.
  6. Aug 13 2021
    Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Pasadena Republican Club
  7. Aug 02 2021
    Response Requested. (Due September 1, 2021)
  8. Jul 14 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  9. Jul 08 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent City of Pasadena to respond filed.
  10. Jul 07 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent Western Justice Center and Judith Chirlin to respond filed.
  11. Jun 16 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2021)