Danesh Rahimi v. Troy Kohler

To Resolve Matters of First Impression for The Supreme Court of the United States : Among the present legal doctrines without definitive resolution for The United States Courts are: May the Utah State Courts enter orders on the basis of a "group quiet title" doctrine which has no precedential authority? a) “Group Quiet Title”: Can multiple property owners engage in a single quiet title action as a group considering statutory plain language indicating otherwise? b) Is “Group Quiet Title ” even constitutional if each individual title has not gone in front of a judge? In the event the state judiciary, as a branch of state government, usurps substantive real property interests, does such action amount to a judicial taking requiring just compensation under the Fifth Amendment's eminent domain provisions? c) Do the United States Courts accept and recognize “group lis pendens ” in their law? d) According to our constitution, who has the right of possession of a property if the real title holder of a property is challenged and it is not about adverse possession because of the property being a hotel unit and the title holder has been paying the property taxes?

Do the United States Courts accept “group defaultjudgments” in “group quiet title ” actions, when these judgments were against entities and noteholders in the past that have no real property ownership nor interest any more while real property holders have no default judgment and were not even given standing to defend their properties?

Due to our advancement in technology and different writing platforms, shouldn't the courts not only look at page numbers but more importantly word count like what the Supreme Court of the United States is doing? Also shouldn’t the Supreme Court of the United States define these standards? What about Hyperlinks?