Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Vincent Tang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, No. H045898, H046697 · judgment December 9, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Are forgery and robo-signing one and the same?
-
Are there due process and equal protection issues surrounding the determination as to whether the bad act is robo-signing or forgery?
-
Is it a violation of due process and equal protection of the law to forbid a victim of forgery to use the judicial process in order to cure his loss?
-
Is it a violation of due process and equal protection of the law to forbid a homeowner the right to challenge defects in the chain of title to his property that led to the loss of his property?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Thomas John Spielbauer
The Spielbauer Law Office
For respondent
Ellen Ross Belfer
Leon Cosgrove LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 21 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jul 14 2021Waiver of right of respondent U.S. Bank, NA and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. to respond filed.
- Jul 12 2021Waiver of right of respondent JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
- Jul 12 2021Waiver of right of respondent Deborah Brignac to respond filed.
- Jun 09 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 15, 2021)