Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Melvin L. Phillips, Individually and as Trustee for Melvin L. Phillips, Sr., et al. v. Oneida Indian Nation

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 19-2737-cv · judgment November 24, 2020


Certiorari denied · June 28, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Second Circuit decision below, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and counsel who has filed here before.

Question presented

i QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW JURISDICTION Can the federal court exercise jurisdiction over this case when the land is listed on a tax map and the tax rolls in the name of New York State? If New York is involved is there jurisdiction in the federal courts? Is the State of New York a necessary party because it is listed in the tax roles and the tax map as having an interest in the land? Should there have been discovery to determine the role of New York State regarding this land? CENTRAL ISSUES Can the Oneida Indian Nation set aside a deed of the Orchard Party/Marble Hill Oneida (otherwise known as Orchard Hill Oneidas) land by the designated head of the Orchard Party, Melvin Phillips when he is placing these Lands in trust for the benefit of the residents of the Marble Hill and the Orchard Party? Has this land been under the control of the Orchard Party since the filing of the map at 111a of the appendix in 1842? Does the Oneida Indian Nation have any interest in this land? Has federal recognition of this parcel as Orchard Party land this been admitted by the Plaintiff Oneida Indian Nation at paragraph 85a, paragraph 17 of the complaint? Does federally filed map at page 111a of the appendix describing the “Orchard Party

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Woodruff Lee Carroll
Woodruff Lee Carroll P.C.

For respondent
Michael R. Smith
Zuckerman, Spaeder, et al.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jun 28 2021
    Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Congressperson Claudia Tenney GRANTED.
  2. Jun 28 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  3. Jun 22 2021
    Response to motion from respondent Oneida Indian Nation filed.
  4. Jun 21 2021
    Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Congressperson Claudia Tenney. (Distributed)
  5. Jun 08 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
  6. Jun 07 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent Oneida Indian Nation to respond filed.
  7. May 28 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 2, 2021)