Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
William S. Palmer v. Harolyn Williams
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Indiana, No. 20A-TP-834 · judgment February 23, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
William Shecoby Palmer being the disseisor who have a common law claim of right to 390 Lincoln Street in Gary Indiana since 09/26/2017,and being equal in the eyes of the law to the tax petitioner Harolyn Williams ask this court do I have a constitutional right to be heard at meaningful time ,and a meaningful place in a impartial tribunal to dispute a case in controversy ,and do i have Procedural due process rights to be given a opportunity to raise a objection to be heard to any cause of action taken against me at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner," Perdue |v. Gargano, 964 N.E.2d 824, 832 (Ind. 2012), and generally includes "'an opportunity to present every available defense,'" Morton v. Ivacic, 898 N.E.2d 1196,1199 (Ind. 2008) (quoting Lindsey v. Non-net, 405 U.S. 56, 66 (1972))
Counsel of record
For petitioner
William Shecoby Palmer
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Mar 28 2022Rehearing DENIED.
- Mar 09 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
- Oct 29 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Oct 29 2021Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 14 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- May 21 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 28, 2021)