Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

William S. Palmer v. Harolyn Williams

Paid petition · Supreme Court of Indiana, No. 20A-TP-834 · judgment February 23, 2021


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

William Shecoby Palmer being the disseisor who have a common law claim of right to 390 Lincoln Street in Gary Indiana since 09/26/2017,and being equal in the eyes of the law to the tax petitioner Harolyn Williams ask this court do I have a constitutional right to be heard at meaningful time ,and a meaningful place in a impartial tribunal to dispute a case in controversy ,and do i have Procedural due process rights to be given a opportunity to raise a objection to be heard to any cause of action taken against me at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner," Perdue |v. Gargano, 964 N.E.2d 824, 832 (Ind. 2012), and generally includes "'an opportunity to present every available defense,'" Morton v. Ivacic, 898 N.E.2d 1196,1199 (Ind. 2008) (quoting Lindsey v. Non-net, 405 U.S. 56, 66 (1972))

Counsel of record

For petitioner
William Shecoby Palmer

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Mar 28 2022
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Mar 09 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
  3. Oct 29 2021
    Petition for Rehearing filed.
  4. Oct 29 2021
    Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
  5. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  6. Jul 14 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  7. May 21 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 28, 2021)