In Re Garvester Bracken

................................... .......................... i PARTIES.............. ................................................................ .. ii TABLES OF AUTHORITIES.................... ....................................... iii-vi OPINION BELOW.......... ...................................................... .......... . ...vii JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT. ........... ....................................... ..viii STATEMENT OF CASE.................................................................... 1- STATEMENT OF FACTS............ ...................................................... 2 REASON FOR GRANTING THE WRIT............................................... 3 CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT. . . .................... ............ . . . ........... 3,4 TRIAL EVIDENCE..................................................................... . . . 3 QUESTION BY THE PROSECUTOR............... .............................. 3 BRACKEN'S ATTORNEY NOT PRESENT. . ....................................... 5 JUDICIAL NOTICE TAKEN.,.................... ................................... .. 3 SUBSUQUENT PROCEEDINGS. . ............................................ .......... 6,7 PETITIONER INJECTS THE JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE................ 7. TRIAL TESTIMONY OF SARAH MOSLEY-BRACKEN. . . . . .’............ 8,9,10 OBJECTION...................... ....................................... ...................... 11 FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF PROCEEDINDS AND RECORDS.... 11 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS CONFESSION................................... 12 PRETRIAL.................. ....................................*............................. 14 NO PRELIMINARY HEARING. . ....................................................... 13 POST CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS................................................. 16 JUDICIAL DUTY AND FINAL ARBITER......................................... 17 WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREM COURT 18 HABEAS CORPU IS A WRIT OF RIGHT................ ........................ 19 STANDARD OF REVIEW.......... ....................................................... ,.20 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS APPROPRIATENESS........ .................... 20 INTERVENING AUTHORITY............................................................ 21 DISPOSITION OF HABEA|! CORPUS.............. .............................. 22 EVIDENTIARY HEARING. . ................................. . ................... 22 JURISDICTION ISSUE REVIEW BY CERTIORARI........................ 23,24 FRAUD IN THE PROCUREMENT OF THE JUDGMENT...................... . 23 CONCLUSION:.................. . . ....................................... . . ............ 26 A. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE................ . . . . ................................. 27 u