Frank Salazar v. Anthony Anderson, et al.

This case is important because it involves lower court decisions that flout this Court’s binding precedent, and, denies the fundamental constitutional rights of an individual considered unpopular for suing government employees and is not represented by an attorney. Colorado courts denied Petitioner access to the courts, and substantive and procedural due process rights to bring and prosecute claims against fellow government employees; and, let stand violations and deprivations of Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the individuals whose property was seized without due process of law by government employees under the influence of rich and powerful private corporate interests. The questions presented are:

1. Whether a Fourteenth Amendment violation and deprivation of substantive and procedural due process rights and equal protection rights occurs where a district court denies a plaintiffs valid Notice of Dismissal under C.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A), and, where the Court of Appeals purportedly affirms the district court action that denied the Notice.

2. Whether there is a violation of the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures, and whether a Fourteenth Amendment violation and deprivation of substantive and procedural due process rights and equal protection rights occurs where a Division of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”) employee seizes the use of a motor vehicle, with no basis in law, and does so before and without notice and a hearing.