Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Monib Zirvi, et al. v. Jay T. Flatley, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 20-546 · judgment December 11, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Did the Second Circuit err in holding, in contrast to the Federal Circuit, that under the “inquiry notice” standard applicable to trade secret misappropriation claims where plaintiff alleges that defendant fraudulently concealed the misappropriated intellectual property (IP), “storm warnings” triggered constructive notice on the part of the plaintiffs?
-
In a trade secret misappropriation case where plaintiff alleges with particularity that defendants fraudulently concealed the misappropriated IP in multiple patent applications, is dismissal with prejudice permissible at the pleading stage under Rule 12(b)(6)?
-
Did the Second Circuit err in summarily affirming the district court’s holding that intellectual property constituting “negative trade secrets” per se have no independent economic value once discoveries constituting related positive trade secrets are published?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Eric Hector Jaso
Spiro Harrison
For respondent
Jay I. Alexander
Covington & Burling LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Jun 30 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 23 2021Waiver of right of respondent Respondent Stephen P.A. Fodor to respond filed.
- Jun 18 2021Waiver of right of respondent Illumina, Inc.; Jay T. Flatley; David R. Walt; Kevin Gunderson; Jian Bing Fan; Mark Chee; Robin M. Silva; John R. Stuelpnagel to respond filed.
- Jun 18 2021Waiver of right of respondent Affymetrix and Applied Biosystems to respond filed.
- Jun 18 2021Brief amicus curiae of Charles Cantor, Ph.D filed.
- May 10 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 18, 2021)